🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to restart atomic discussions with the United States as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue produced results, and revealed new appeals had originated from intermediaries to resume talks with the US government. He asserted Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran had not yet reached a point to permit the global atomic watchdog to access bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Complex Course

The foreign minister is navigating a challenging route since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be operating from a stance of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Discussions Abruptly Terminated

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the American leader asserting the facilities had been eliminated. Subsequently, European countries exercised their right to reinstate international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Diplomats asserted repeatedly they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Current Situation

Tehran representatives said the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the offer could be resurrected in certain ways if discussions reopen.

The American leader last week claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting consistent overtures from the United States either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been accused of passivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his speech to the gathering, intended to portray the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of global regulations, Araghchi said the 12-day war demonstrated the clash could not be ended by armed force. He said the assaults began with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and concluded with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making faith hard to rebuild.

Dialogue Stays the Final Answer

The foreign minister stated: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always tried to enforce their will during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be alive and stays the primary answer to settle disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."

"In case they address to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and respect, they will receive a response in the equivalent tone."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the battle of restoration and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was certain Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We acquired many lessons from this war; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He added: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to destroy, continues to exist. The facilities and equipment, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is important is the will of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have grown stronger, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the wake of this invasion."