🔗 Share this article

During the previous race for the White House, the former president courted the electorate with promises to lower costs starting on day one. However, once he assumed office, there was precious little focus to the cost of living. This shifted following inflation-weary voters delivered a rebuke at the polls. Shortly thereafter, the Trump administration launched a hastily assembled effort to address affordability. Unfortunately, the drive is a hot mess—characterized by illogical claims, inconsistencies, unrealistic expectations, scapegoating, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Out-of-Touch Assertions and Grocery Store Truth

Just two days post-election, the president kicked off his affordability drive with a poorly received remark: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” These words from billionaire Trump—often mingles with fellow billionaires—demonstrated a lack of empathy for everyday citizens facing difficulties every time they go supermarkets. In effect, he ignored their struggles as trivial, implying they had it wrong about price levels.

His assertion that everything was “way down” proved highly misleading and dishonest. In what way could every price be falling when his cherished tariffs were increasing costs? Recent data show the cost of bananas increased nearly 7% in the last twelve months, beef prices climbed 14.7%, and coffee prices surged by nearly 19%—partly due to import taxes on Brazil’s coffee and beef. In the first three quarters, costs increased in the majority of main grocery groups monitored by the government’s price index, such as meats, poultry, and fish (up 4.5%), drinks (up 2.8%), and fruits and vegetables (rising slightly).

Contradictions and Falsehoods in Economic Statements

In spite of these numbers, Trump persists in repeating his misleading narrative about lower costs. After the vote, he has stated there is “almost no price increases,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” These statements ignore the fact that prices overall have unarguably risen after the previous administration. Currently, price growth is running at a 3 percent per year, that’s 50% higher than the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal. In another falsehood, Trump boasted that fuel costs had dropped to around two dollars, despite government figures show they average over three dollars.

Faced with actual conditions and lower approval ratings, advisers evidently warned that his “costs are falling” rhetoric made him sound dangerously out of touch from ordinary people. Many citizens are angry about prices continuing to climb following promises of decreases. In response, advisers proposed one quick fix: roll back certain import taxes. This sensible idea contradicted Trump’s absurd assertion that additional taxes would not increase costs for American shoppers.

Proposed Solutions and Their Potential Impact

With some tariffs being rolled back on coffee, beef, tomatoes, and bananas, Trump will probably announce that he has cut prices once those foods start declining in price. This would be similar to a firestarter boasting for putting out a fire that he had started. On another occasion, when addressing fast-food leaders, Trump stated that “this is the golden age of America” and told listeners that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” Such statements come naturally for a wealthy individual to make, but seem insincere to millions of Americans who are struggling—particularly when many risk cuts to nutrition assistance or rising insurance costs.

Per a survey from October, three-quarters of respondents believe economic conditions are mediocre or bad, while only 26% consider them good or excellent. A separate survey showed that 61% of Americans say Trump’s policies have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Financial Reality and Proposed Steps

Scott Bessent, Trump’s top economic official, recently contradicted claims of a golden age. He noted that instead of thriving, certain sectors of the US economy “have contracted.” The manufacturing sector—a priority for the administration—appears to have contracted for eight months in a row and lost approximately tens of thousands of positions this year. Pointing to these challenges, Bessent called on the central bank to reduce borrowing costs—an action that could ease financial pressure.

Reacting to public dismay about affordability, the president suggested a direct payment of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “high income people.” For many struggling Americans, this sounds like a financial lifeline, but the prospects are dim that Congress—concerned about large shortfalls—will approve such a plan. This idea could raise government expenditure, push up borrowing costs, and possibly fuel inflation by injecting cash into the economy.

A further proposed solution for affordability centered on introducing 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that they could reduce monthly mortgage payments. But, reality is that such lengthy loans would do little to lower monthly payments—frequently reducing them by a small amount per month. The downside is that these mortgages could significantly increase the overall cost homeowners pay and slow their accumulation of equity.

Blaming the Past Government and Economic Prospects

In their affordability campaign, the administration have once more blamed the previous president for economic problems, including increasing costs. Spokespeople claimed they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “addressing the prior administration’s price hikes.” These are absurd and inaccurate claims. In reality, the former president handed over a robust economic situation, with low price growth, economic growth strong, and minimal joblessness. But, Trump’s policies—particularly his tariffs—have created an economic mess, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.

Per an economist, lead analyst at a research firm, 22 states are already in recession, with their economies damaged by Trump’s tariffs. He fears that if key regions such as California and New York enter a downturn, the US could face a widespread recession. In downturns, people typically have less money to spend, and inflation usually declines. Unfortunately, with Trump’s much-ballyhooed affordability campaign probably ineffective to control costs, his most effective “tool” for achieving increased affordability might prove to be triggering an economic contraction—a scenario that hard-pressed households really can’t afford.